To learn more about the Risk Data Open Standard (RDOS) industry initiative, you will be redirected to the RDOS domain.
RMS Estimates Economic Damage from Kumamoto Japan Earthquakes Will Range Between 2.5 and 3.5 Billion USD
NEWARK, Calif. -
April 21, 2016 -
RMS, a global catastrophe risk management firm, estimates that economic property damage for both the April 15 moment magnitude (Mw) 7.0 earthquake and April 14 Mw6.4 earthquake in Japan’s Kumamoto Prefecture to be between $2.5 and $3.5 billion USD. This includes damage to property and contents for residential, commercial and industrial buildings. This estimate does not include business interruption, shake and landslide-induced damage to infrastructure (roads, highways, bridges, airports, train transport, utilities, dams), or damage to Kumamoto Castle.
RMS sent a reconnaissance team to the affected area to make an informed assessment. The damage estimate is based on the findings of this visit combined with detailed modeling analyses of how severe the shaking was in different locations. The modeling was carried out using RMS RiskLink version 15.0.
Chesley Williams, RMS senior geophysicist, said “there are hundreds of shallow crustal faults across the Japanese Islands. The events last week were likely associated with the Futagawa - Hinagu Fault System. The damage from these events is concentrated in Kumamoto Prefecture in close proximity to this fault system and was primarily due to strong ground shaking and slope failures.”
Key observations by the RMS reconnaissance team:
The principal areas of damage are to the towns of Nishihara-mura, Minamiaso-mura, and Mashiki-machi.
The area has a local river network and hilly terrain where landslides or slope failures were triggered in some locations causing localized pockets of damage.
Buildings located up-slope from small landslides were relatively undamaged or suffered light damage, whereas buildings on or beneath affected slopes experienced moderate to complete damage.
Nearly all buildings that collapsed or had partially collapsed on the slope or the area beneath it were within close proximity of each other.
Evidence of soft story failures (for example in stories with less strength due to extensive glazing, wide doorways or other openings) was observed in some buildings with older construction, in addition to pounding (impacts) between neighboring properties, which caused damage across multiple adjacent buildings.
Older mixed-use buildings were seen to have sustained damage or in some cases suffered complete collapse because they were inadequately constructed to withstand lateral (sideways) forces.
Older, traditional residential dwellings were found to be particularly susceptible to ground shaking and slope conditions.
RMS models and software help financial institutions and public agencies evaluate and manage catastrophe risks throughout the world, promoting resilient societies and a sustainable global economy.
This Content is Locked
For security reasons, this proprietary content is locked. To access this, and other RMS content, please continue to RMS Owl. If you are already a member, simply sign in for exclusive access. If you are an RMS client but not an RMS Owl member, sign up via the Need to Register option on the RMS Owl home page to unlock this important resource.