Tag Archives: underwriting tools

SiteIQ: The Power of Now

The democratizion of risk data is a core mission for RMS; to provide relevant, timely risk insight to everyone who needs it, designed for every role in the business, from those on the frontline of underwriting, through to those responsible for the entire portfolio. Delivered through simple, elegant applications, by ensuring relevant data gets to every area of a business you can build empowered teams that can take effective decisions.

SiteIQ is a great example of this data democratization in action. This application pulls property results from RMS catastrophe models – and supported by qualified third-party data such as crime scores and fire protection measures, it provides an understanding of which hazards are applicable for each location at the point of risk-selection. Risk scores from one to ten, red-amber-green referral advice, high resolution hazard maps, and loss cost data – is all delivered in seconds.

Continue reading

RMS Location Intelligence API: Underwriting with 20/20 Vision

This is a taster of an article published in the latest edition of EXPOSURE magazine featuring the RMS Location Intelligence API. For the full article click here or visit the EXPOSURE website.

The insurance industry boasts some of the most sophisticated modeling capabilities in the world. And yet the average property underwriter does not have access to the kind of predictive tools that carriers use at a portfolio level to manage risk aggregation, streamline reinsurance buying and optimize capitalization.

Detailed probabilistic models are employed on large and complex corporate and industrial portfolios. But underwriters of high-volume business are usually left to rate risks with only a partial view of the risk characteristics at individual locations, and without the help of models and other tools.

Many insurers invest in modeling post-bind in order to understand risk aggregation in their portfolios, but Ross Franklin, senior director of data product management at RMS, suggests this is too late. “From an underwriting standpoint, that’s after the horse has bolted — that insight is needed upfront when you are deciding whether to write and at what price.”

By not seeing the full picture, he explains, underwriters are often making decisions with a completely different view of risk from the portfolio managers in their own company. “Right now, there is a disconnect in the analytics used when risks are being underwritten and those used downstream as these same risks move through to the portfolio.”

Continue reading